麻豆社国产

Skip to content

Jan. 6 panel sets vote on contempt charges against Bannon

WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥 A congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection has set a vote to recommend criminal contempt charges against former White House aide Steve Bannon after he defied the panel's subpoena on Thursday.
20211013181044-6167616306654d5f69863ee3jpeg

WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥 A congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection has set a vote to recommend criminal contempt charges against former White House aide Steve Bannon after he defied the panel's subpoena on Thursday.

The chairman of the panel, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said the committee will vote next Tuesday to recommend the charges. That would send the recommendation to the full House for a vote.

If the House votes to pursue the contempt charges against Bannon, the Justice Department will ultimately decide whether to prosecute. The committee had demanded documents and testimony from Bannon, who was in touch with President Donald Trump ahead of the violent attack.

鈥淭he Select Committee will not tolerate defiance of our subpoenas, so we must move forward with proceedings to refer Mr. Bannon for criminal contempt,鈥 Thompson said in a statement.

The committee had scheduled a Thursday deposition with Bannon, but his lawyer said that at Trump鈥檚 direction he wouldn't appear. Bannon also failed to provide documents to the panel by a deadline last week.

A deposition for a second witness that had been scheduled for Thursday, former Defense Department official Kashyap Patel, has been delayed, but Patel is still engaging with the committee, a committee aide said.

Two other men who worked for Trump 鈥 former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and longtime Trump social media director Dan Scavino 鈥 were scheduled for depositions Friday, but they have both been pushed back as well, according to the aide. Meadows, like Patel, has been given a 鈥渟hort postponement鈥 as he is in talks with the panel. Scavino's deposition has been rescheduled because there were delays in serving his subpoena.

Bannon鈥檚 testimony is just one facet of an escalating congressional inquiry, with 19 subpoenas issued so far and thousands of pages of documents flowing in. But his defiance is a crucial development for the committee, whose members are vowing to restore the binding force of congressional subpoenas after they were routinely flouted during Trump鈥檚 time in office.

鈥淢r. Bannon has declined to cooperate with the Select Committee and is instead hiding behind the former President鈥檚 insufficient, blanket and vague statements regarding privileges he has purported to invoke," Rep. Thompson said in his statement. 鈥淲e reject his position entirely.鈥

Other witnesses are cooperating, including some who organized or staffed the Trump rally on the Ellipse behind the White House that preceded the violent riot. The committee subpoenaed 11 rally organizers and gave them a Wednesday deadline to turn over documents and records. They have also been asked to appear at scheduled depositions.

Among those responding was Lyndon Brentnall, whose firm was hired to provide Ellipse event security that day. 鈥淎ll the documents and communications requested by the subpoena were handed in,鈥 he told The Associated Press.

Brentnall had previously said, 鈥淎s far as we鈥檙e concerned, we ran security at a legally permitted event run in conjunction with the U.S. Secret Service and the Park Police."

Two longtime Trump campaign and White House staffers, Megan Powers and Hannah Salem, who were listed on the Jan 6. rally permit as 鈥渙perations manager for scheduling and guidance鈥 and 鈥渙perations manager for logistics and communications,鈥 have also provided documents or are planning to do so.

It remains unclear whether the others who were subpoenaed intend to cooperate. A committee spokesperson declined to comment Wednesday on the responses it had received and how many of the 11 were complying.

Two additional rally organizers, Ali Alexander and Nathan Martin, as well as their 鈥淪top the Steal鈥 organization, were also subpoenaed for documents, which are due Oct. 21.

Many of the rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 marched up the National Mall after attending at least part of Trump鈥檚 rally, where he repeated his meritless claims of election fraud and implored the crowd to 鈥渇ight like hell.鈥 Dozens of police officers were injured as the Trump supporters then broke through windows and doors and interrupted the certification of President Joe Biden's victory.

The rioters repeated Trump's false claims of widespread fraud as they marched through the Capitol, even though the results of the election were confirmed by state officials and upheld by the courts. Trump鈥檚 own attorney general, William Barr, had said the Justice Department found no evidence of widespread fraud that could have overturned the results.

Also Wednesday, the panel issued a subpoena to a former Justice Department lawyer who positioned himself as Trump's ally and aided the Republican president's efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 election.

The demands for documents and testimony from Jeffrey Clark reflect the committee's efforts to probe not only the insurrection but also the tumult that roiled the Justice Department in the weeks leading up to it as Trump and his allies leaned on government lawyers to advance his election claims.

Clark, an assistant attorney general in the Trump administration, has emerged as a pivotal character. A issued last week showed that he championed Trump's efforts to undo the election results and clashed as a result with Justice Department superiors who resisted the pressure, culminating in a dramatic White House meeting at which Trump ruminated about elevating Clark to attorney general.

The committee's demands of Trump aides and associates are potentially complicated by Trump's vow to fight their cooperation on grounds of executive privilege.

Biden has formally rejected Trump鈥檚 claim of executive privilege surrounding a tranche of documents requested from the former president鈥檚 time in the White House, and has set up the documents' potential release to Congress in mid-November. White House Counsel Dana Remus wrote to the National Archives in a letter released Wednesday that Biden believes that 鈥渁n assertion of executive privilege is not in the best interests of the United States.鈥

__

Colvin reported from New York and Smith from Providence, Rhode Island. Associated Press writers Farnoush Amiri and Zeke Miller in Washington contributed to this report.

Mary Clare Jalonick, Eric Tucker, Jill Colvin And Michelle R. Smith, The Associated Press