麻豆社国产

Skip to content

DA won't seek new death sentence against Scott Peterson

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) 鈥 A California district attorney said in a court filing Friday that she won鈥檛 seek a new death sentence against Scott Peterson, convicted in 2005 of murdering his pregnant wife.
20210528220552-60b1ace8d8ad3f3ef7fa9fd7jpeg

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) 鈥 A California district attorney said in a court filing Friday that she won鈥檛 seek a new death sentence against Scott Peterson, convicted in 2005 of murdering his pregnant wife.

The Stanislaus County district attorney鈥檚 office said it would drop efforts to restore the penalty thrown out last year by the state Supreme Court. The DA said the decision was made in consultation with Laci Peterson鈥檚 family.

The California justices ruled the death sentence couldn鈥檛 stand because potential jurors were excluded after saying they disagreed with the death penalty.

The family has 鈥渘o doubt鈥 Peterson killed his wife and unborn son Conner and deserves the death penalty but doesn鈥檛 want to pursue that punishment because 鈥渢his process is simply too painful to endure once again,鈥 District Attorney Birgit Fladager said her filing in San Mateo Superior Court.

Peterson, now 48, was convicted in the San Mateo court after his trial was moved from Stanislaus County due to the massive pre-trial publicity that followed the Christmas Eve 2002 disappearance of 27-year-old Laci, who was eight months pregnant.

Investigators say Peterson took the bodies from their Modesto home and dumped them from his fishing boat into San Francisco Bay, where they surfaced months later.

Peterson maintains his innocence and a judge is considering whether to grant a new trial because a juror failed to disclose that she had sought a restraining order in 2000 against her boyfriend鈥檚 ex-girlfriend. She said in seeking the order that she feared for her unborn child. The judge must decide if that amounted to juror misconduct, and if so, whether it was so prejudicial that a new trial is warranted.

If no new trial is granted, he will be sentenced to life imprisonment.

One of Peterson鈥檚 attorneys said the announcement is not a precursor to a plea deal and that his client will seek a new trial if a judge decides his first one was tainted by juror misconduct.

Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo said she hopes to make a decision this year whether Peterson merits a new trial.

It鈥檚 not clear if prosecutors could again seek the death penalty if there is a new trial and he was again convicted, said defense attorney Pat Harris, who is handling the death sentence portion of the case.

A different attorney, Andras Farkas, is representing Peterson on the issue of whether he gets a new trial. Farkas did not respond to an email requesting comment.

鈥淚t鈥檚 not clear to me that they鈥檙e saying no matter what, we鈥檙e taking the death penalty off the table ... or they鈥檙e saying if we go back to trial we鈥檙e reserving the right to put the death penalty back up again,鈥 Harris said. 鈥淚t sounds like they鈥檙e kind of holding back that if the judge orders a new trial, they could put the death penalty back on the table.鈥

That could be cleared up at what was supposed to be procedural hearing on Tuesday, he said.

The district attorney's office did not comment.

Harris noted that prosecutors had earlier said the family supported again seeking the death penalty, and contended that their new motion is a gambit to avoid a new airing of the case.

鈥淭he truth of the matter is they have determined ... that the handwriting is on the wall and if we go back to trial we鈥檙e going to prove Scott鈥檚 innocence,鈥 he said.

He said he can prove that there was a nearby burglary the day Peterson disappeared, aiding the defense鈥檚 contention that someone else killed her when she stumbled upon the crime.

If prosecutors were to proceed with a new penalty phase, they would essentially have to retry the entire case before a new jury 鈥 so that new evidence would come out even if jurors could not acquit him and could only recommend a sentence of death or life in prison, he said.

鈥淭he truth will have come out. Bottom line is people will know what happened鈥 even if he doesn鈥檛 receive a new trial on his guilt or innocence, Harris said.

Scott Peterson鈥檚 family and supporters made a similar argument in a , that Harris鈥 request last week for evidence in the hands of prosecutors triggered their decision.

鈥淲e are grateful that Stanislaus County is no longer seeking to put Scott to death, but it鈥檚 #Time4aNewTrial,鈥 the post said.

Don Thompson, The Associated Press